It also deals with the intended Great Taking. This stops that as well. Very important to get legal actions in the courts I think, to jam them all up with their plans. Also to tell the people, you are all the real owners of the land.
We need to have a movement of people working to get the land returned to the people. All people should have free land by birth. This is the only way to survive the madness of the plans. Please take a look at Paragov. It is really good and is talking about exactly this point.
One way we could do it is through the principle of Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet which is essentially that you cannot own what you did not create or legitimately acquire. This is the case for the land of the world and the ones who wrongfully therefore claim ownership of it through monarchies and churches etc. This principle could also be applied to stop the intended Great Taking. Take a look at my post here on these subjects at the following link. Hope you like it. We need to have a movement around these principles as well and spread the word to the people about it.
Past all the legal arguments you outline, it seems it comes down to two opposing forces: the moral right of peoples to live on the land freely, versus the armed attempts to confiscate such lands (as under the current and planned enforcement regimes). That's the simplified version... but of course things are never so simple in practice!
Agreed. We need to take a moral stand as you say in this respect also. This can be a very powerful way to stand up against them as well I think. They are always trying to make the people feel they are wrong and need to get off the land to preserve the environment etc. These are all bogus arguments they are using against the people to try to gain the moral high ground against them. So they already use this tactic against us all. It is time we all started using it back against them and taking the moral high ground position back off them, through the moral right of the people's to live on the land freely. Thank you so much for your comment. It provides yet another very powerful argument against what they are doing, and for the people to have free land. Otherwise, we are all just born slaves to this system. We cannot be truly free until we have our birthright of a free piece of land at birth!
And just one more point about the very important point you have made about the moral right of people to live on the land freely. Maybe more than one point. It is actually a God given right to us. A right that should never have been taken away. Christ himself said, in the Sermon on the Mount, the meek will inherit the earth. The meek are the oppressed which are all of us against the wrongful controllers of this world and the earth is the land itself. Not only does there exist a moral right for the people to live on the land, I think we also have a moral duty to fight for it.
Having said that, your comment also stirred another thought in me which is that these wrongful rulers are running this big scam game in this world about needing to protect the environment from human destruction, which is their justification for taking the land off people. But as you know well, the destruction of the environment is actually being caused by them and their wrongful economic (and other) control of this world, which promotes consumerism in order to keep their bogus system going, and them in control.
But in a world where we kind if know they have inverted everything, the true answer to saving the environment, actually lies in giving everyone a free piece of land, on which they can live peacefully and self sustainably.
When that happens, people cease to be super consumers for various reasons, because they do not need to do that anymore because they can make their own house or food on the land, don't need to travel etc, but also because when they get their land, they on fact "self actualise", and become satisfied and happy with what they are and have, and are no longer wanting to prove themselves by all the stuff they can buy to show to others. They don't need fancy cars or clothes after that to prove their status. They will be happy, once they get their own land and will spend all their time thinking about how to make it into a nice home for themselves and their families. I am sure you agree. Maybe you or someone else might like about this aspect as well. It is important that we turn everything back around on them. Because it is all rubbish, what they are saying.
I had to chuckle a bit over your vision that is basically "We will own everything and we will be happy." I was living the "back to the land" lifestyle for 20 yrs in the 80s and 90s, indeed "spending all my time thinking about how to make it into a nice home for myself and my family." And yes, happy in fulfilled in important ways, yet also super stressed and overworked and creatively frustrated. In the end I realized I would rather write and play music than weed carrots and repair fences, so moved back to the city. (Now, 25 years later, more of a happy medium on a rural island). Point being, once again, it's not so simple! Or, simple, but not easy! Or, each to his own.... Yet another realization was that the old model of sustainability on the land was much more about community and collaboration than our nuclear-family style "self-sufficiency."
It also deals with the intended Great Taking. This stops that as well. Very important to get legal actions in the courts I think, to jam them all up with their plans. Also to tell the people, you are all the real owners of the land.
We need to have a movement of people working to get the land returned to the people. All people should have free land by birth. This is the only way to survive the madness of the plans. Please take a look at Paragov. It is really good and is talking about exactly this point.
https://paragovdigest.substack.com/p/paragov-insights-land-part-3-the
Yes, couldn't agree more! Now the question is, how to get there from here?
One way we could do it is through the principle of Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet which is essentially that you cannot own what you did not create or legitimately acquire. This is the case for the land of the world and the ones who wrongfully therefore claim ownership of it through monarchies and churches etc. This principle could also be applied to stop the intended Great Taking. Take a look at my post here on these subjects at the following link. Hope you like it. We need to have a movement around these principles as well and spread the word to the people about it.
https://theworldidreamof.substack.com/p/the-legal-basis-for-land-to-be-free
Past all the legal arguments you outline, it seems it comes down to two opposing forces: the moral right of peoples to live on the land freely, versus the armed attempts to confiscate such lands (as under the current and planned enforcement regimes). That's the simplified version... but of course things are never so simple in practice!
Agreed. We need to take a moral stand as you say in this respect also. This can be a very powerful way to stand up against them as well I think. They are always trying to make the people feel they are wrong and need to get off the land to preserve the environment etc. These are all bogus arguments they are using against the people to try to gain the moral high ground against them. So they already use this tactic against us all. It is time we all started using it back against them and taking the moral high ground position back off them, through the moral right of the people's to live on the land freely. Thank you so much for your comment. It provides yet another very powerful argument against what they are doing, and for the people to have free land. Otherwise, we are all just born slaves to this system. We cannot be truly free until we have our birthright of a free piece of land at birth!
And just one more point about the very important point you have made about the moral right of people to live on the land freely. Maybe more than one point. It is actually a God given right to us. A right that should never have been taken away. Christ himself said, in the Sermon on the Mount, the meek will inherit the earth. The meek are the oppressed which are all of us against the wrongful controllers of this world and the earth is the land itself. Not only does there exist a moral right for the people to live on the land, I think we also have a moral duty to fight for it.
Having said that, your comment also stirred another thought in me which is that these wrongful rulers are running this big scam game in this world about needing to protect the environment from human destruction, which is their justification for taking the land off people. But as you know well, the destruction of the environment is actually being caused by them and their wrongful economic (and other) control of this world, which promotes consumerism in order to keep their bogus system going, and them in control.
But in a world where we kind if know they have inverted everything, the true answer to saving the environment, actually lies in giving everyone a free piece of land, on which they can live peacefully and self sustainably.
When that happens, people cease to be super consumers for various reasons, because they do not need to do that anymore because they can make their own house or food on the land, don't need to travel etc, but also because when they get their land, they on fact "self actualise", and become satisfied and happy with what they are and have, and are no longer wanting to prove themselves by all the stuff they can buy to show to others. They don't need fancy cars or clothes after that to prove their status. They will be happy, once they get their own land and will spend all their time thinking about how to make it into a nice home for themselves and their families. I am sure you agree. Maybe you or someone else might like about this aspect as well. It is important that we turn everything back around on them. Because it is all rubbish, what they are saying.
I had to chuckle a bit over your vision that is basically "We will own everything and we will be happy." I was living the "back to the land" lifestyle for 20 yrs in the 80s and 90s, indeed "spending all my time thinking about how to make it into a nice home for myself and my family." And yes, happy in fulfilled in important ways, yet also super stressed and overworked and creatively frustrated. In the end I realized I would rather write and play music than weed carrots and repair fences, so moved back to the city. (Now, 25 years later, more of a happy medium on a rural island). Point being, once again, it's not so simple! Or, simple, but not easy! Or, each to his own.... Yet another realization was that the old model of sustainability on the land was much more about community and collaboration than our nuclear-family style "self-sufficiency."
interesting, thanks
Thank you Norwick for your like and comment. The following link may provide the pathway. It is the truth!
https://theworldidreamof.substack.com/p/the-legal-basis-for-land-to-be-free